5 min read

The biggest problem I used to have as a pilot was landing at different airports. I used to say, “I hate this airport; the runways are different…” Strange, but I never have problems parking my car in a different lot, with spaces that face a different direction than my normal office lot. I still have to put the car in the middle and pointed straight!

RV-12 landing on centerline

That nosewheel really likes the centerline – anywhere else and you’re doing it wrong.

Thinking back after many years, I’ve learned five things that have made landing at unfamiliar airports much easier. It doesn’t matter if the runways face a different direction or are a different size than your home airport. All runways are the same as far as landing technique. The visual approach never changes.

For every runway the following is true:

  1. You need to land centered.
  2. You need to land with the nose lined up with the direction of the runway. (No Ercoupe comments, please…)
  3. You need to maintain the same stabilized airspeeds.
  4. You need to judge your height by looking at the runway numbers or touchdown zone on final.
  5. If you aren’t stabilized on final, go around!

To land centered with the nose pointed straight, nothing will help more than experience and practice. I didn’t become really “good” or consistent until after my commercial certificate and several hundred hours. It’s pretty common for a new student to complain that, “I make it look so easy.” It is easy after 5,500 hours and I promise it will get easier for them, too. They just need a little time and experience.

A stabilized approach in a Cessna 172 might be the following:

  1. Downwind abeam the numbers and cleared to land–carb heat on, power back to 1700 rpm, flaps 10, airspeed 85kts
  2. Base Leg–flaps 20, airspeed 75kts
  3. Final–flaps 30, airspeed 65 kts

The above is an example that works well in most Cessna 172s, but remember to always consult your specific pilot’s operating handbook.

Citation cockpit shot landing

Are the runway numbers moving up? Time to adjust glidepath.

To visually judge your glidepath, stare at the runway numbers in your windshield and note where they are vertically. For example in a Cessna 172, they might be centered vertically with the glareshield always below the numbers. This is important to keep your speed constant as well. If your nose comes up during the approach, you are slowing down. To judge your glidepath, watch if the numbers appear to move up or down. If the numbers move up in your windshield you are low; if they move down you are high, if they just get bigger, you are on a stable glidepath.

If you are getting low, add power and hold the nose down to maintain airspeed. Never try to fix a low altitude by pulling up! Remember the famous quote while landing, “Low and Slow is No Bueno!”

If you are going high, reduce power and hold the nose from falling and increasing your airspeed. This can cause you to float and use up more landing distance.

You have to use the exact same airspeeds, configuration, power setting, and crosswind corrections you would on any runway and focus your vision on the exact same touchdown point. It’s only when you focus on how things around the airport look different and stop flying the basics that it becomes “hard.”

Here’s where people tend to get in trouble: a different runway width, direction or a different airport can cause people to stop focusing on the four basics listed above. There’s a really popular airport at Catalina Island (KAVX) on top of a small mountain where the runway is bent in the middle (elevation change) and with cliffs on three sides. Ask almost any SoCal pilot and they will tell you how hard Catalina is to land at. I remember the first time I landed at Catalina and how all I could look at was the cliff before the approach end of the runway. I was so fixated on the cliff that my approach was 300 feet high and 15 kts too fast! It’s easy to do, believe me. If I had used the same constant approach speeds and configuration and visual aiming points, it would have been a much better landing. Accidents only happen when people lose a stabilized approach.

Yes, there are slight differences in the touchdown and braking on short and soft runways, but the overall concept is always going to stay constant. You may need to come in slightly faster with less flaps for more control in a crosswind.

Mountain flying is more similar than different; just remember to fly the same indicated airspeeds. However mountain flying go arounds may need to be started earlier than normal.

The most important thing I ever learned early in my flight time was the go around. I had an older instructor who wouldn’t let me land unless everything was almost perfect on short final. Two hundred feet too high and 10 kts too fast: “Go around!” he would yell. I was pretty convinced he wasn’t ever going to let me land the plane on some lessons. When I asked why, he gave me a quote that I’ve never forgotten and I still use today when I teach. “Never try to save a bad landing approach, the pros go around and do it right.” Ask any airline pilot about how they land and you will hear the same answers over and over again. It’s always about flying a “stabilized approach” or they go around.

Try flying with a constant indicated airspeed, configuration (flap settings), and power settings on every landing and your landings will get easier. Focus on looking outside at the numbers and always be ready to go-around. This really helped me and I bet it will help you too.

What are your best landing tips and tricks? Add a comment below.

Gary Reeves
Latest posts by Gary Reeves (see all)
9 replies
  1. Stephen Phoenix
    Stephen Phoenix says:

    I’ve noticed that a really wide runway can screw up the depth perception. Seems like some peripheral visual cues you normally use get lost. Easy enough to get used to, but landing on a big wide runway after nothing but normal runways catches one by surprise.

    I’m less enthusiastic than some about go arounds. When flying gliders it is not an option and I’m not sure that going around should be used with such gay abandon in a power plane. Sure, it can be done if executed early enough, but many times people wait too long. If the wait is too long then the go around only results in an accelerating crash sequence rather than a relatively benign decelerating one. I have witnessed these several times. It’s one of those things that’s easier to say than do in actual practice because of the wide variance of situations that one can be confronted with.

    • Steven Wood
      Steven Wood says:

      Your right about depth perception with wide runways, but usually wider runways mean longer runways, so you can afford to shoot over the numbers a little. I sometimes think we put too much emphasis on “hitting the numbers” and for a young student that can give them in trouble over correcting.

      Good article!

    • Gary
      Gary says:


      Thanks for your comments! A wider or narrower runway can certainly be challenging for the flare unless you use your peripheral vision to judge height agl. A go-around is always safer than trying to save a bad landing, but you are absolutely correct in that any maneuver, including go-arounds requires training. This is why I require them during training and flight reviews.

  2. Jacob
    Jacob says:

    As a glider pilot I’ve always been slightly dubious of the “never try to save a bad landing” mentality. Maybe I’ve just spent too long thinking about flying without go arounds as an option, but seems to me practice making good landings out of bad approaches would be pretty useful in emergency situations.

    • Gary
      Gary says:


      With powered flight you are safer going around, because you have the option. But I do wish, and recommend, that all “powered” pilots take at least a couple glider lessons. If you fly often enough, you will have to be a glider pilot eventually, and look how great “Sully” did!

  3. Dan Evans
    Dan Evans says:

    One thing you are guaranteed after takeoff, is a landing. There are some elements that require planning. First is to maintain a consistent traffic pattern. Unless there is an airport specific variation in the AIM, the standard is 800ft for under 12.500 lbs. Downwind, the runway should normally be jus above (low wing) or below (high wing) the wing tip. Mid downwind, begin the landing checklist to be completed abeam the threshold of the runway. Slow to approach speed with the approach power (this includes power off if desired). Continue until the threshold is 45 deg. behind, then turn base. This is the key point. View the threshold. If you are high, a slight turn away from the runway will extend your descent time, if low start the turn to final, if just right (correct) , proceed. Final turn should normally be completed by 400 ft., power constant, approach speed stabilized, maintaining runway centerline. Touchdown point should not move up or down, as was stated in the article. Quality landings require quality practice. Anything less only takes gravity.

  4. Tony
    Tony says:

    Just one comment: always keep the centerline as you see it, especially on long final, between your feet. This eliminates the possible urge to move the centerline to the middle of the cockpit which can result in a big offset of the aircraft to the right of the centerline.

Comments are closed.