Cessna P210
6 min read

Personal aviation lost its greatest champion when Richard L. Collins passed away. Richard was 84 and he died at home.

I was so lucky to work for and with Richard for more than 40 years. Richard refused to be called an aviation journalist. What he did, and I did, at FLYING magazine, and for him at AOPA Pilot, and then for Air Facts Journal on the web, is personal aviation promotion. Richard championed the cause of using our own airplanes for personal travel on our own schedule with a maximum of schedule reliability and safety.

Young Richard Collins

Richard started early in the flying and writing business, riding with his father Leighton.

Richard’s understanding that private airplanes could be more than fun flyers that could get the aviation enthusiast off the ground flowed directly from his father, Leighton Collins. Leighton was a true pioneer who sold airplanes starting in the 1930s. After the end of World War II, Leighton recognized that the new crop of airplanes could and should be useful traveling machines. But to achieve that goal, the safety record had to improve, and pilots needed to be able to fly safely in most weather conditions.

To help educate pilots on how to safely and effectively use their airplanes Leighton founded Air Facts magazine 80 years ago. It was a compact publication that became the bible for a generation of pilots who were first putting their airplanes to use for travel.

Richard wrote his first articles for Air Facts and later he brought the same airplanes as traveling machines philosophy to FLYING magazine. And most importantly, and controversially, Richard brought the study of accidents as a vital teaching tool. Before Richard, the general aviation industry tried to minimize accident reporting. The attitude was flying is easy and safe. Take a drive in the sky. Anybody can do it.

What Richard understood, and reported, is that it was true, most anybody can be taught to be a safe pilot, but flying your own airplane is not easy, and can never be safe enough until pilots understood the real risks and learned how to minimize them.

It didn’t take much study to know that weather was a huge factor in the safety of personal flying, and is the primary limitation on travel schedule reliability. So Richard threw himself into the study of how weather affects everything a pilot does.

Many readers over the years have commented to me on how much bad weather Richard flew through. But that wasn’t true. I often was surprised by the deviations or delays Richard would make for weather when I would have plunged ahead. But he understood the conditions, what the airplane and pilot could handle, and how to adjust route and altitude to avoid the worst.

We constantly talked and compared experiences on our trips. He was the best at analyzing the big weather picture and could explain why I was hitting my head on the overhead in turbulence when I could have turned right or left, or gone up or down, and avoided it if I had his experience and understanding.

Richard was not one to jump at all new aviation technology as a way to control risk. His most surprising finding was that multiengine airplanes were not automatically safer than singles. In the post-war era, and even through the 1970s, it was conventional wisdom in personal aviation that a twin was safer than a single, especially at night or flying IFR. It seems so obvious. A twin has the potential to continue to a runway after an engine failure while the single will make a forced landing.

Richard’s study of accident statistics showed that pilots of twins weren’t doing so well at getting to a runway after an engine failure. In fact, accidents in twins after engine failure were statistically more serious and more often fatal than engine failure accidents in singles.

His findings stood most of our thinking on its head but he didn’t really find anything wrong with twins in terms of true safety potential. What Richard’s work proved is that the safety offered by another engine was only available to pilots who were trained and proficient enough to fly the twin with an engine out.

Cessna P210

N40RC, the Cessna P210 that Richard flew on countless trips for FLYING magazine.

Richard was not quick to promote autopilots as a safety technology because, well, they weren’t very good in the early days. But as autopilots became better, and redundant systems for operating gyros came on line, Richard became the strongest proponent for having and using an autopilot for all IFR flying.

In contrast, Richard immediately saw the value of the Stormscope and had one of Paul Ryan’s very first systems installed in his airplane in the mid-70s. The Stormscope sure couldn’t reliably pinpoint the exact location of a thunderstorm, but it was the first real storm avoidance aid available to piston single pilots so it was a huge safety advance, and Richard embraced it.

Richard didn’t like the term “general aviation” much because, well, it was too general. When he studied accidents and utilization he always eliminated Alaska, ag flying and charter. Those activities all fell into the FAA’s broad general aviation category, but they weren’t personal flying. And personal flying is what Richard did, and what his thousands of readers wanted to learn how to do.

Richard and I agreed that his timing was excellent. He was there for the big post-war growth in personal flying. He got to fly and write about all of the important airplanes that set the standards, and many of which still fly on. And in the magazine business he was there for the best years when Flying circulation approached half a million and more than 100,000 single copies sold on newsstands.

By any measure personal flying and magazine publishing have passed their peak. But what a ride it was. Richard pioneered personal airplane travel by flying his fabric covered Piper Pacer IFR when almost no other light airplane pilot was. And he ended his career flying GPS LPV approaches in a fully ice-protected and weather radar equipped pressurized single.

I talked with Richard on the phone a few days before he died. We spoke often, and I thought he sounded a bit frail on the phone, but he didn’t mention any health issues. Nor would I expect him to.

As always, he thanked me for calling and told me to stay in touch. I told him to hang in there. If either of us had known what was just days into the future, I don’t think we would have said anything different.

Mac McClellan
10 replies
  1. Roy Uchman
    Roy Uchman says:

    So sad. I’ve been reading and looking up to Mr. Collins as a personal hero for decades.

  2. Kipp
    Kipp says:

    Mac… nice to read your words of a dear friend. I always marveled at Dick’s relatability. His writing was simple and direct with no pretense. So much so that even Hal sent him a garage door opener before he’d ever met Dick personally. Tagging along with you guys was witnessing people who were so great at what you did, enjoying it so passionately. The journey always exceeded the destination. When we flew down to Bo’s wedding we stopped in South Carolina. Dick radioed ahead and asked for information about wind speed. We were given the specifics from the tower, and Dick commented, the cross wind will be greater than the advice reported from the ground. He knew that understating the wind would better assure their ability to sell jet fuel rather than deterring the pilot from flying on to a different spot where the air was calmer. He read people like he read the weather. I liked the stories and deeper life experiences… his self-depreciation, acknowledging that his childhood learning style drove his grade school teacher nuts, how the Army taught him important lessons – principally that nothing good happens after 11 PM and that the early morning is a gift of nature and human nature. His personal stories of flying the Governor of Arkansas were classic. And the time Barry Goldwater showed a picture of LBJ how he really felt about him. Dick was so much more than the words of safe and adventuresome flying. I will cherish that.

  3. Mac mcclellan
    Mac mcclellan says:

    You’re right, Kipp. Richard or Dick—he responded to either—was the most approachable and kind person any pilot could imagine. No matter what you flew, or why you flew, he was interested in your experiences and concerns. He won’t be replaced.
    Mac Mc

  4. Pete Bedell
    Pete Bedell says:

    Great tribute, Mac. Richard’s timing in this industry was perfect as you say. He saw it all. Unfortunately, he also saw the demise of Concorde and we both agreed that it was aviation’s first step backward.

  5. Bill Miles
    Bill Miles says:

    I never meant Dick although I read his articles and columns for many years.
    There was one incident both he and I were involved in. During the early Cessna 441 days, he was doing a flight evaluation, landed at the narrow Cessna Pawnee factory runway, and experienced a runway excusion when one propeller didn’t go into reverse when both were selected. Damage was relatively minimal.It did not show up in flight because power control was electronic in normal mode, but prop pitch control in beta was mechanical.
    My involvement was that I designed the inappropiately safetied ball joint connection that came undone. My excuse was that I was relatively new and inexperienced, and I designed it the way my boss told me to.
    I believe Dick only mentioned the incident once in one of his columns and did not go into detail as to make, model, or circumstances.
    Hopefully these things don’t happen where good aviators go.

  6. George Haeh
    George Haeh says:

    Dick’s articles and books saved more lives of pilots and passengers than we will ever hear about, likely including this pilot and three passengers.

    I had read his book on night flying and followed his advice on doing the first three hundred feet of climb at night on instruments to avoid flying into something.

    A hundred feet or so on a takeoff into a black hole, I touched the knob to adjust the brightness of the instrument lighting – and the cabin and instruments went dark.

    Very promptly I reached back to turn on the dome light as mentioned in his book. Brighter than I liked, but good enough to get us 300′ AGL where outside lights gave me a usable horizon and I could fiddle safely with the panel light dimmer. Sure beat fumbling with a flashlight.

    Thank you Dick

  7. Richard Files
    Richard Files says:

    I’ve been flying and reading Richard Collins for 38 years. One of the highlights of my earlier years was working line service as a college student when Mr. Collins and Mac McClellan were in Tucson to train at Flight Safety. I was thrilled to meet two of Aviation’s most respected and influential writers. Mr. Collins’ wisdom will be with generations of pilots for decades to come.

  8. B. Bolte
    B. Bolte says:

    Nice article, Mac. I only met you and Mr. Collins a couple of times at Air Center One in ICT when I worked there on the ramp in the mid 80’s. I had spent my college years flight training and reading back issues of FLYING in the university library in lieu of studying for exams. And so, after graduation and starting my aviation career on the very lowest rung, I knew all about Dick’s adventures in 40RC. I admit to always peeking at the panel to see what was new and different every time I saw it on the tie-down. Truly, a giant in his field, and a positive influence to many.

  9. Chris G
    Chris G says:

    A significant loss to the aviation community. I have moved recently and have gone through the boxes and boxes of aviation magazines on order to streamline my life now that I’m on the “Back 9.”
    Most of what I have are Flying, both magazines and special editions of some sort or another. Richard (and J. Mac) figure in far too many to count, and the writings and connection he/they had with the reader is beyond compare. I always knew that if they were sitting in my livingroom or with me at a distant airport cafe that they’d be exactly as they wrote.
    In all respects and by all accounts, that is how “Dick” was. “Connected to us.”
    Thank you, Mac, for the kind words related to an extraordinarily fine man. No better person to share than you!

Comments are closed.