Aeronca finished
9 min read

In 2008, Wes Anderson, a retired Delta Airlines pilot from Seattle, Washington, asked if I wanted to purchase an Aeronca Chief that was in storage on the family farm near Malta, Montana. Wes and I knew each other from my years as an agricultural scientist involved in on-farm research in northern Montana.

The airplane was a 65C Chief, serial number 6399 and registered as N23974, that came off the production line on October 6, 1939. The Aeronautical Corporation of America built the so-called 1-series Chief between 1938 and 1940. Of more than 200 65C Chiefs that were built, the FAA registry shows that there are only 70 still registered within the US.

Initially, I was uncertain about acquiring another airplane. I had owned a Cessna 172 until financial circumstances forced me to give it up. But my spouse stated that I “needed a project” to get my mind off the challenges at work. So, in fall 2009, I committed without realizing how much time and effort would be required to restore an old Aeronca.

Wes loaded the airplane into an enclosed trailer and drove to the Eastern Oregon Regional Airport in Pendleton. The restoration project took place in an WWII-era hangar that EAA Chapter 219 leased from the city. I would have a place to work and access to individuals with knowledge and skills in aircraft repair. My only experience as an aircraft mechanic was years ago repairing and maintaining amphibious aircraft in the US Coast Guard.

Montana’s dry, cold climate had been kind to the airplane—there was very little corrosion on the steel frame. Though the engine and metal parts were sound, the wooden structure and covering were not. All of the original plywood formers and longerons were replaced with new wood. Mice had chewed the rear spars and so new ones were obtained from a firm specializing in the manufacture of wooden parts for Aeronca aircraft. During winter, when too cold to work in the unheated EAA hangar, I repaired wing ribs at home using new spruce cap strip and plywood gussets.

Aeronca finished

Aeronca Chief N23974 after restoration at Pendleton, Oregon in 2020.

Harold Nelson, an A&P/IA mechanic with over 60 years of experience, supervised my work. He loaned me a rotisserie that eased the tasks of covering, rib stitching, and painting. The final color was Colorado red with black trim, based on the original paint scheme. The original Eiseman magnetos were replaced with new Slick magnetos, along with shielded ignition harness and spark plugs. Harold shaped the upper cowling to accept the longer, shielded spark plugs. A one-piece windshield was installed to replace the original two-piece and an electric pump replaced the original, manual fuel transfer pump that was bulky and leaky. A handheld radio, hung from the dash, would serve as the sole communication device. An antenna designed to work without a ground plane was mounted inside the fuselage behind the seat.

The last five percent of the project was the really detailed work. Over several months, Harold and I rigged the controls, tested the fuel system for proper flow rate, undertook the weight and balance, checked for leaks, installed fuel drain valves, adjusted wing camber, and finalized the paperwork.

Finished with the restoration, it was time to fly the Aeronca. All my experience was in tricycle gear Cessnas and I had not flown as PIC in years. I needed to obtain a BFR and tailwheel endorsement, but the insurance company required an instructor with a minimum of 10 hours in make and model to be added to the open pilot policy. I had heard of Fred Ball, a flight instructor from nearby College Place, Washington, who specializes in tailwheel aircraft. Fred is a master pilot who logged the majority of his 27,000+ hours flying in western Alaska. He is also known to many as “Mr. Goose” because of his intimate knowledge of Grumman Goose and Widgeon seaplanes. The insurance company had no issues with Fred’s qualifications.

We flew on days of light and variable wind typical of late summer in eastern Oregon. Fred wanted to start at 7 am and complete the training within a week or two. Each session lasted an hour and a half. If conditions remained calm, we went up a second time. At first, Fred worked with me to keep the airplane oriented with the runway centerline during high-speed taxi. I was very tense. It was extremely awkward not pushing on one rudder pedal or the other quickly enough and with the right pressure to keep the airplane straight. My wild oscillations forced Fred to rescue the airplane during my first efforts.

Soon Fred had me practice takeoffs and landings in the pattern. He emphasized the importance of using the ailerons and rudder together to make coordinated turns. He reminded me to keep the ball centered when turning and the wings level when straight. Apparently, aerodynamic knowledge in the 1930s was incomplete and thus coordinated handling is critical with a vintage airplane. In addition, Fred explained that, due to changes in angle of attack of one propeller blade or the other, one must learn how much pressure to apply to one rudder pedal or the other to achieve aerodynamic balance during climb or descent.

The airplane cruised at 80 mph on the downwind leg with the power set at 1900 rpm. Fred instructed me to reduce power to 1000 rpm, hold the nose at an attitude to maintain an airspeed of 65 mph, and adjust power to control rate of descent on approach. Sometimes I was too high. Fred showed me how to perform a forward slip to reduce altitude while maintaining 65 mph. Achieving three-point touchdowns took time because I was concerned about keeping the airplane straight. I could not see over the cowl in a nose-up attitude and so sensed alignment using my peripheral vision to see each side of the runway. If the airplane bounced, I would lower the nose and add power. Fred corrected me by stressing the importance of maintaining lift by keeping the nose up and adding power as needed. Sometimes, on touchdown, Fred would sternly call out, “use the wheel to keep the wings level!” if I let the right wing go up.

After three days of training, I had developed a feel for rudder and allerion control. On the fifth day, Fred was more confident of my ability and surprised me with instructions to fly solo three times around the pattern. How thrilling to taxi out by myself and take off! Single mindedly, I voiced the procedures Fred had taught me during the execution of each leg, controlled the airplane methodically, and landed each time with a heightened sense of my surroundings. Success! I had completed my training and received the tailwheel endorsement from Fred.

Flying Start book

Cover of book describing the Etchart Flying School. Student pilots with Aeronca Chief N23974 at Havre, Montana in 1940.

Registration records on file with the FAA revealed that Ralph E. Morrison of Helena, Montana, had purchased the airplane from the factory in October 1939, but then sold it to Gene Etchart in spring 1940. The logbooks showed Glen G. Grazier, a mechanic, had signed off the service and maintenance. In addition, the 82-year old airplane had accumulated nearly 1,000 of its 1,500 hours of total flying time during this one-year period.

The significance of this information became clear when Wes sent a book entitled A Flying Start into the Big Sky (1998, Star Publishing Co.) that told of the role of the Etchart Flying School in the Civilian Pilot Training program. The government created the CPT in 1938 to not only boost civil aviation, but also train 20,000 college-age students, both men and women, in preparation for a likely entry into a European war. Morrison had purchased an Aeronca Chief for his flying school under CPT contract at Havre, Montana, with Grazier as instructor and mechanic. Later, after training a first class of students in fall 1939, Morrison was unsure he wanted to continue and sold the school and the airplane to an enthusiastic Etchart.

Because the book corroborated the FAA and logbook records, it was clear that Morrison and Etchart’s Aeronca at Havre had been N23974. At the time, the airplane had a 50 hp Continental engine. Logbooks show a 65 hp engine being installed in 1953. This Aeronca was one of three airplanes that Etchart used to train a second class of 30 students between June and October 1940. On page 13, he writes:

“There were two Aeronca Chief planes, one with 50 hp and one with 65. The Taylorcraft had 65 hp and was a good performer. None of the planes had self-starters or radios. You had to hand crank them, and today, this is nearly a lost art. There were no radios for communications and the way you avoided collisions was via the method of see, and be seen, and consistently fly correct traffic patterns so that the other pilots could predict your likely actions and location. None of our airplanes had wing flaps, to lower the landing speed, and to compensate for this, all the students were taught the side-slip maneuver for losing altitude in order to get into a short field. The airplanes were sturdy, simple, reliable and easily maintained.”

Etchart stated that students usually soloed in eight to 10 hours after receiving training in forced landings, stalls, spins, steep turns, sideslips, spot landings, and navigation. In 1940, Havre’s airfield was a grass field that allowed the students to land into a wind from any direction. Amazingly, these authors write how the entire class would turn out to grab and hold onto the wings of an airplane when it wheel landed into a strong headwind to keep it from blowing over!

Handshake

Glen Grazier and Gene Etchart (left to right) next to Aeronca Chief N23974 at Havre, Montana in 1940. Photograph copied from book “A Flying Start into the Big Sky” by P. Gudmundson, G. Etchart and O. Markle.

After graduating, many of these students further trained with the military and flew with the Army Air Corps in WWII. Morrison, Etchart, and Grazier also had important roles as military aviators during this critical period. In 1942, Morrison was killed in a military aircraft accident on Christmas Eve near Tampa, Florida, while serving as a flight instructor in the Army Air Corps. Etchart also served in the Army Air Corps as flight instructor after Pearl Harbor. He maintained his flying status to nearly age 95—his five-digit pilot’s license number was among America’s longest active licenses. Grazier flew gasoline, bombs and other supplies to Allied forces in the China-Burma Theater.

Aeronca Chief N23974 was one of many light civilian airplanes that were used across the nation to prepare thousands of individuals for military pilot training prior to WWII. Notable individuals who started under the CPT included John Glenn, Richard Bong, Bud Anderson, George McGovern, and Robert Dietz. Having an aircraft with an association to people who served in WWII inspires awe. But the fact that N23974 is still flying today, due to simple design and construction, is also impressive.

Now with 25 hours of solo time, I am less apprehensive about the wind and am enjoying the whole experience of hand starting and flying a light airplane. Fuel consumption is only 3.5 gph in cruise at 2000 rpm. To me personally, this simple, vintage airplane and the generosity of masterful individuals provided a welcome opportunity to learn and experience flying once again.

Dan Long
Latest posts by Dan Long (see all)
17 replies
  1. Aaron Trueblood
    Aaron Trueblood says:

    That is a great story! Living in Northwest Montana I enjoyed reading about the history. Beautiful aircraft to!

    Reply
  2. Jimmy McNaughton
    Jimmy McNaughton says:

    Congratulations, Dan on completing the restoration of a fine old airplane, and on your re-entry to flying. I’m partial to the 65-C, as our little flying club operates one (the only airplane in the club). I believe the longer you fly her, the more you’ll like her. Like you, she was the airplane that reacquainted me with flying after a long hiatus. I also had never logged any time in a tail wheel airplane prior. She’s a good teacher, but not too hard on her students. Enjoy.

    Reply
  3. George Haeh
    George Haeh says:

    Lovely story. I got checked out on Citabrias with more HP. It was great fun flying circuits, but every half dozen landings or so when I was beginning to think I knew how to land the thing, it would let me know otherwise.

    Reply
  4. DALE DAVIS
    DALE DAVIS says:

    The most important part of the story is what a great wife Dan has to encourage him to have such a project. The start to finish restoration and then learning to fly the machine accurately is a great fulfillment and accomplishment. Keep going Dan!

    Reply
  5. John Trimble
    John Trimble says:

    Wonderful story, and thanks for providing and preserving the history of N23974. A great reminder that each airplane is more than the sum of their parts.

    Reply
  6. Skip
    Skip says:

    Dan:
    Your not going to believe this. My Aeronca is NC23962 and #6229 manufactured on October 10 1939. It is a”:stick chief” that is for the war effort, a control stick was installed as opposed to a wheel or yoke. over head window and two doors. Originally it had a Lycoming 65 but for some reason it was swapped out for a Continental in 1940. The second door was an “option” the basic model had only a left door.. 962 was restored in 1991 I obtained the aircraft in 2012.
    Over the years I have added upgrades,A Becker Radio, wind driven alternator 400 mega hertzELT, with a internal ribbon antenna. Drop me an email, love to compare notes and stories. My partner in crime is restoring a 1938 Aeronca

    I will be looking for that book you mentioned in your story sounds like a good read.

    Reply
    • Fred Hogan
      Fred Hogan says:

      I have NC23971, #6289, dated 12 October 39, 65C with C65-3 engine with up exhaust. We have same paint color scheme-nice job. Guess they assigned N number before completion date.
      Going from 50 to 65 hp is a good upgrade, 50 would be too underpower…The Cont engines were better than Lyc in the small hp.
      I can’t image just one door, cockpit is small enough as is….guess it saved a buck or two.
      My dad and uncles had two Chiefs, (NC23907, NC24261) used in the CPT program for Miami U, Oxford Ohio. The traded in their K models….NC23971 has been in family since about 1950.

      Reply
  7. John F Ney
    John F Ney says:

    Dan,
    I could have replaced your name with mine. I ventured into the same mission of restoring N-27325, a 1940 Aeronca 60 T-F. I thought it would take one year but turned into five. The airplane now has a 65 continental with a wood prop. Like yours mine also was used as a pre-war trainer. I got mine flying in July of last year. Feel free to contact me if you want to compare notes.

    Reply
  8. Hunter Heath
    Hunter Heath says:

    As a former Chief owner (the stories of which I’ve published here), I enjoyed your journey. It is a privilege to restore and fly these old machines. By the way, Bill Pancake, who installed a C-85 on my Chief with field approval, may now offer an STC for this engine upgrade. I went from a C-65 to a C-85 with Skytech starter– oh, the glorious feeling of starting it with a key and enjoying hp to spare!

    Reply
  9. John Wells
    John Wells says:

    I had a Aeronca Chief, N3593E. On my first date with my wife I put her in the right seat. I got out of the left seat and told her I had to start the plane. She said “don’t you turn a key or something?”. So I said watch this! I tied the tail down and pulled the prop a couple of times and the old Chief started right up. It was always a good starter. After undoing the tail we were off. She was rather amused. We are still going strong. The Chief is still alive in the midwest. Now I have old Apache. Great fun!

    Reply
  10. Eric
    Eric says:

    I own N21039, a 1938 KM which originally had a 50 HP Menasco and changed over to a 65 HP 0 145 B-1 single magneto Lycoming in 1940. Only nine were made and mine is serial number KM4. After the conversion it was changed to a 65-LA. Great little airplane, open cowl and single door.

    Reply
  11. Richard Dorman
    Richard Dorman says:

    I have a 1941 Aeronca 65CA chief, and live near the
    Tri-Cities in WA. I’ve heard of your restoration from several sources over the years. Great story on the history of your plane. I had a late friend who was a B-26 pilot in WWII. He soled in a aeronca chief on the 12-7-1941. He celebrated with his instructor by throwing out a role of paper and cutting it with the propeller as they descended. Once on the ground they found out that WWII had just started for the US.

    Reply
  12. Richard Dorman
    Richard Dorman says:

    Ralph Morrison died in a B-26 crash, when he tried to land at the wrong airport in foggy conditions at night. The tower at Sebring cleared them to land on runway 18. Instead they tried landing on runway 22 at the Avon airport which was 9 miles away. They flew into heavy ground fog on short final and crashed short of the runway.

    Reply
  13. Don W.
    Don W. says:

    A pretty yellow Aeronca Chief was my dad’s first airplane circa 1961. It had been a US mail plane, and still had the canvas mail bag behind the seat. Dad would load my mom and three kids into the Chief and fly the 100 miles from our farm in eastern Kansas to central Kansas to visit my grandparents — both sets of whom lived on their respective farms. We always landed close to the house and taxied up into the yard, so I grew up believing everyone did this. Imagine a Chief with five souls onboard! Mom would hold my younger sister on her lap, and my older sister and I would be in the mail bag. Believe me, an hour + is a long time for a toddler to sit in a mail bag with the strong smell of avgas mixed with fabric dope.

    The picture of your restored red Chief brought back a lot of memories. Keep her flying!

    Reply
  14. Michael Douglas Urubek
    Michael Douglas Urubek says:

    Great story. I own and fly N23956, a 1939, S-65-C, Chief. It is a fantastic flyer and I fly it every day, weather permitting. An interesting bit of trivia on the airframe is that it does not have a single AD, after 82 years! I consider that amazing and a testament to the build quality and the engineering that went into the production of the aircraft. I see from the article that you were taught an approach to landing speed of 65mph. I wonder why so fast? With my airplane the Vs (37) X 1.3 is 48 mph. You also mentioned bounces and I think your approach speed may be a factor with that. When I first got my Chief, I was approaching at 60 mph and consistently had issues with bounced landings. I then adjusted the approach to 50 mph and have not had a single bounced landing since. Just a thought.

    Reply
  15. Bob
    Bob says:

    I flew with my friend Dan this morning: no clouds, no wind. We went northwest from Walla Walla to see Ice Harbor Dam, Columbia River basalts, giant ripple marks from the Missoula floods, and the Juniper Dunes Wilderness. Dan is a master pilot and plane restorer.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *